A useful update to the 2009 Grant & Booth paper - covers various review methodologies and groups them into review "families"
The following table highlights some of the differences between systematic and literature reviews. The two can be confused as both are used to provide a summary of the literature or research on a topic.
Kysh, Lynn (2013): Difference between a systematic review and a literature review. [figshare]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.766364
A useful summary of types of review from the PhD On Track web resource.
In Business and Management Systematic Reviews are less common but other less detailed reviews do take place. These can be called a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA), Critically Assessed Topic (CAT) or Systematic Literature Review. See also the Rapid Reviews section above.
Business Systematic Literature Reviews
Initially intended for information specialists, researchers, students and others will find this excellent resource invaluable to aid understanding of the different types and phases of the review and how to follow the processes involved: https://bslrblog.wordpress.com/.
Other useful links and resources: